Monday, October 12, 2009

Nobel

After the so-called peace prize and last year's economics prize I was ready to write off the Nobel awards completely. However this year the economics award is terrific. Oliver Williamson and Elinor Ostrom. Both have examined institutions and their role in growth, development, and just about everything else. Ostrom provided empirical research showing that the commons problem was not one that necessarily required state action. Individuals are able to devise methods dealing with common ownership in a variety of settings. I use this work to support my own view that problems like the prisoner's dilemma, commons, public goods, asymmetric information, lock in, etc., are not market failures. People will devise solutions to such problems in most cases.

2 comments:

  1. I found the following very interesting, when asked to present the ten works they find have formed their own academic development the most - Ostrom replied below. (Bonus - I have included Buchanan's response - for obvious reasons). See the full list at

    http://www.tidsskriftetpolitik.dk/index.php?id=124

    Elinor Ostrom



    1. Lasswell & Kaplan, Power and Society

    2. Buchanan & Tullock, The Calculus of Consent

    3. Olson, The Logic of Collective Action

    4. Commons, Legal Foundations of Capitalism

    5. Ostrom, The Intellectual Crisis

    6. Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior

    7. Mayr, The Growth of Biological Thought

    8. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial

    9. North, Institutions, Institutional Chance and Economic Performance

    10. Camerer, Behavioral Game Theory



    James M. Buchanan



    1. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Value

    2. de Marco, First Principles of Public Finance

    3. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order

    4. Knight, The Ethics of Competition

    5. Rawls, A Theory of Justice

    6. Smith, The Wealth of Nations

    7. Tullock, The Politics of Bureaucracy

    8. Vining, Econmics in the United States

    9. Neumann & Morgenstein, Theory of Games

    10. Wicksell, Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen

    ReplyDelete
  2. David Henderson agrees with Boyes

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574469372956187270.html

    ReplyDelete